*Note*: Café Philo is a way of meeting interesting, inquiring people who enjoy talking about life's big issues and conundrums in a convivial atmosphere, rather than a heavy-duty philosophy seminar. Read more about our approach [here](https://www.meetup.com/cafe-philo-bristol-bath/). Hatred, misogyny, racism, vigilantism and personality cults existed long before the internet. Pamphlets, newspapers, radio and rumour have been used to inflame fear, reward demagogues and mobilise crowds. It cannot therefore be blamed for inventing cruelty or tribalism. Yet it is equally misleading to call it a neutral mirror. Digital platforms alter speed, scale, anonymity, permanence, coordination and reward. We train recommendation systems through what we watch, share and linger over; they then shape what we encounter next. Because anger, fear and novelty hold attention, outrage can become commercially valuable. Research does not support a simple verdict: digital media can increase participation and knowledge, while also being associated with declining institutional trust, polarisation, hate and populism. The same mechanisms can help an isolated young person find understanding, expose abuses ignored by institutions or organise assistance. They can also produce pile-ons, livestreamed vigilantism and communities in which increasingly extreme behaviour earns status. The architecture creating influencers also allows political leaders to bypass parties and journalists, turning followers into a personal constituency. The result may be not only a shift to the right, but a wider transfer of power from institutions to personalities. The controversy over the treatment of Professor Jason Arday before his death raises a related question. Criticism and investigation may be legitimate; their cumulative repetition across headlines and individual posts can become punishment, without any participant feeling responsible for the whole. No causal claim about his death is needed to ask when scrutiny becom

Description supplied by the event organiser.